Following the burst of violence in a number of western countries (U.S.’s attack to Afghanistan and Iraq, to name one of them) that used to be the worlds’ role models in many things, some fellow friends begin to ask on who will become the future role figure in determining the civilization of humanity. A question that is indeed hard to be answered. Quoting a holy scripture, it is easier for the tangled thread to be pulled from the needle’s hole than to find figure able to set good examples for civilization in this era.
For the optimists, there is always an open window of opportunity in every era. If the light of the role figure is still unseen then it might because the time has not come yet for the covering cloud to pass. In other words, the light does exist; it is but still unveiled. Analogically, there are two kinds of archer whose target is concealed by the cloud. The first archer waits for the cloud to pass while the other insists to shoot and takes the risk to miss the target.
Both are having their own advantage and detriment. The first attitude is safer, but when the cloud disappears the target might has already occupied by other archers’ arrows. The second is risky yet it is more likely to be successful compared to the first.
With this kind of risk, some of us then start to predict the future determinants of
civilization. Some nominate China for its population and economic development. Some mention India because of its impressive mastership in IT. Some refer to South Africa, particularly for the firm foundation of development built by Nelson Mandela, and you readers may as well add the list with personal opinions.
Whatever the country is, it is hard to be imagined as a role model of civilization without the role of an astonishing leader. Therefore, the exploration of ideas on this subject is going to be focused on the characters of leadership.
In dealing with the present challenges, there is no other word more suitable than “hard”. When even leaders who have performed greatly (as Thaksin in Thailand) were coup d’etated, what will become of those who perform less? Let alone those who govern for a few years, even those who have held the power for decades have to fall.
Therein emerges the importance of perseverance in leadership, and Mahatma Gandhi was one among the leaders possessing great determination. Challenges that he had encountered are countless. From being tortured when he was a lawyer in South Africa, facing the British colonial with both power and weapon in their hands, to being tempted with authority upon the independence of India. Nevertheless, under whatever kind of temptation Gandhi kept on persisting with his two principals: non-violence and integrity not to intermix personal matters with the struggle affairs.
In this century, it is hard to find someone comparable to Gandhi in the matter of non-violence. His physical body tortured and wounded for many times in both South Africa and India, Gandhiwas still consistent to the creed of non-violence. Before his passing away he even still asked mercy for the one who shot him.
Gandhi’s innermost quality in determination not to intermingling personal matters and struggle affairs was revealed during the early days of India’s independency. Numerous figures from both Hindu and Moslem parties agreed that Gandhi is the most qualified person to be the first Prime Minister. Nevertheless, as written by the quill of history, Gandhi sheltered the purity of his struggle by letting Nehru been elected as the Prime Minister. Hence, Gandhi was truly a characterwho knitted the beauty of life with two determinations: non-violence and the purity of struggle.
However, as have been recorded by time, there are too many leaders practicing “blind determination” (determination without guidance/guideless determination). In analogy, those leaders are similar to a boatman who rows vigorously (determinedly) without realizing that he is notthe only person in the boat. Hence, the determination is then associated with repression.
Furthermore, an era frenzied with opinions, struggles, conflicts, and clashes of interests, is no longer the time to persuade people with stick, fist, threat, and especially by killing. No matter how strong one’s personality is, how gloomy his/her experiences are, how sentimental he/she toward life is, mortals are still longing for the touches.
The matter is more or less similar to Cleopatra who became the first to conquer Europe. Taj Mahal, a non-Hindu who was not the consort of the king as well, yet she left remarkable memory of being a charm in a kingdom where most of its people were Hindus. Like Mother Theresa who touched the heart of the world. This is then the point where humankind needs a Rumi.
If Gandhi is astounding with his determination, Rumi is with his touches. In most of his works one may sense dignity, charisma, vibration, and touch. There was once a day when Rumi was deep in a profound prayer. Upon finishing his pray, he knocked on the door of The Lover who Loves Most. A voice behind the door asked: “Who is that?” Serenely Rumi answered: “It is me”. Almost instantly, the voice replied: “Please go, for there is no room may contain the two of us in this house.” Being rejected, Rumi resumed his insightful prayer. When he felt the sufficiency, he once more knocked at the very door. The same voice was heard: “Who is that?” Rumi, now trembling was he, answered, “It is Thee…” and the door was immediately opened. Anyone who journeys his/her own within will understand how distant Rumi has wandered.
The Door in Rumi’s account has been knocked in many ways both during prayer and work. However, for those who are still busy with the word “I” (occupied with ego, arrogance, boast, anger and hatred) the Door remains closed. The Door will naturally open for seekers upon their lost of self.
In the words of the wise: ‘When you step up in the path of God means you step down in the path of ego’. Ascending the divine stairways means descending the ladders of ego. And both Gandhi and Rumi’s life are full with inspirations by their stepping down the ladders of their ego.
Hereby, in the end of this discussion let us try to dispose a perspective on what nation will be the future role model of civilization. It is any land borne leaders as determined as Gandhi and as stirring as Rumi, for there the light of civilization may rise to guide those who are still seized by the darkness.